This system has small yields of the crop but permits for a variety of foods grown. On the other hand, if it is used wisely, it is a great boon and a benevolent friend of man. Real per capita incomes almost doubled in Asia between 1970 and 1995, and poverty declined from nearly three out of every five Asians in 1975 to less than one in three by 1995. Modern plant breeding, improved agronomy, and the development of inorganic fertilizers and modern pesticides fueled these advances. On the contrary, a lot of people experience a feeling of uneasiness.
Modern science has made our life easy, comfortable, luxurious and least burdensome. The absolute number of poor people fell from 1. There were large deposits of coal and iron around Great Britain which helped let them become the first industrial nation. The accomplishments of the Green Revolution depended on the full application of the principles of genetics to crop improvements, and significant improvements in the ways they were grown, including improved irrigation and the application of larger quantities of fertilizers. When the ability to produce transgenic organisms was first attained, scientists, concerned with the possible negative effects of their discoveries, began a series of conferences and experiments to see if the methods involved posed any unique danger to human beings or other species. Irrigation practices have led to salt build-up and eventual abandonment of some of the best farming lands. Hybridization, including interspecific hybridization, forms part of the normal course of plant evolution, and genes are transferred between species and strains as a result.
The Green Revolution lifted many people out of poverty and gave them a higher chance for survival. In my opinion, the green revolution has been a roaring success. This need is especially urgent in Sub-Saharan Africa, which has yet to experience an agricultural revolution of its own. The increase of carbon dioxide in the air as result of environmental pollution is increasing the incidence of diseases and incurable ailments. But simply adding to the pile of food will not be enough.
By the 1980s, however, the methods for doing so had been developed, and the first field tests of transgenic plants were conducted in the early 1990s. Latin America also experienced large gains of wheat and rice. If the plants are transgenic, or selected to resist the herbicides or pests by other means, they are of course a permanent feature of the environment in which they are grown, a factor that might facilitate the production of resistant strains more than in situations where the pesticides are applied periodically. A much more serious problem concerns the major subsidies for rice cultivation in the United States, which have little purpose and disrupt world markets to a very large extent. We badly need to develop transgenic cassava and other crops that are vital for feeding the people who live in the tropics, and do not have the right to play with their welfare for ideological reasons that we invent in rich countries that do not think the world needs food. It is definitely a curse.
Farmers also benefited from the green revolution as well as mostly all economies. Since 1961 Africa's agricultural production has increased fourfold. At the same time, the Green Revolution had many negative environmental impacts that have still to be adequately redressed. I believe the Green Revolution was a success. Science has been used very effectively in improving the agricultural production.
Solutions for energy revolution 25. For example, we are learning a great deal about the distances over which pollen can be dispersed, and consequently about the size of populations of plants and the relationships between them. The Green Revolution also contributed to better nutrition by raising incomes and reducing prices, which permitted people to consume more calories and a more diversified diet. Moreover, most smallholders were able to keep their land and experienced significant increases in total production. Researchers have charged The Green Revolution with environmental degradation. The Green Revolution doubled yields in some places like Asia. It all depends how we use science and its great potential.
Variations within major zones and effects of markets 3. The direct benefits to the poor through their own on-farm adoption, greater agricultural employment, and empowerment have been more mixed and depend heavily on local socioeconomic conditions. We have reaped rewards in almost all fields of life. The transformation turned the Western world from a largely agricultural to an overwhelmingly. In the Industrial Revolution, new methods of producing iron bar without charcoal were devised and these were later applied to produce steel. As part of the global effort to develop sustainable and productive agriculture, transgenic plants have a key role to play, as I shall discuss here. Nagarjuna, an ancient, leading Indian scientist, discovered many methods of curing diseases, using plants for medicinal purposes.
Economically, this was essential, however, it did cause much environmental damage. The remaining environmental effects of the cultivation of transgenic crops that we will examine have to do with the results of their hybridizing with wild or weedy relatives, and the possibility of the transgenic crops themselves or such hybrids becoming weeds in cultivated fields or spreading into natural habitats. Building on these principles, and in the second half of the 20th century, the Green Revolution led to the development of productive crops that saved the lives of hundreds of millions of people, especially in Asia. But of course with a revolution of this degree has to have been some type of negative impact. Industrialization in Britain in general, allowed them to grow and prosper into the nation that they are today.