Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. He seamlessly moves to his next idea while still supporting al of his previous claims. Otherwise, this is a good intro with an opinionated thesis claim. Writing—4: This response is cohesive and demonstrates highly effective use and control of language. And yet it is only when people are by themselves that they can truly achieve their most important goals.
Also in the article, Gioia reveals to the audience the consequences of this trend. Using this study-based fact, Gioia aims to alert people to the personal benefits that come with reading regularly. Many medical centers have concluded that are bodies need darkness to produce many different hormones and to continue with processes to keep us alive. We are led to believe that fabulous wealth and fame await the person who works the hardest and is always busy. Sentence structure is varied, and some precise phrasing is used to convey ideas robbed of the oppurtunity, their own personal health. This type of insightful analysis is evident throughout the response and indicates advanced analytical skill. Analysis—4: This response offers an insightful analysis of the source text and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the analytical task.
What does eagerness to lack of using money mean? For example, in the first paragraph, the writer claims that One of the senses Bogard uses within his essay is touch, but none of the ensuing discussion relates to touch at all. He uses the word intellectual multiple times for effect. Although there are no errors of interpretation or fact in the essay, this incomplete understanding demonstrates only partially successful reading comprehension. . According to Bogard, natural darkness can be a positive help to humans. Dana Gioia builds an argument designed and commissioned by the National Endowment for the Arts.
One of the senses Bogard uses within his essay is touch. Only what you write on the lined pages of your answer booklet will be evaluated. Among hourly workers, poor reading skills ranked second, and 38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension. Overall, the response demonstrates inadequate analysis. On the whole, this response offers some evidence of cohesion and control of language. In this essay, organization and language errors such as syntactically awkward sentences and sentence fragments detract from the quality of the writing and often impede understanding, leading to a score of 2.
Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations. People have taken to writing long pieces in newspapers… Just saying the same thing over and over again. He then goes on to state how Paris has taken steps to exercise more sustainable lighting practices. In each instance of analysis in this short response, the writer identifies the use of evidence or rhetorical features, but asserts rather than explains the importance of those elements. Bogard extends the facts to offer various solutions. In the United States and Western Europe, the amount of light in the sky increases an average of about 6% every year.
By asking this question, Bogard draws out heartfelt ponderance from his readers about the affecting power of an untainted night sky. Gioia can put faith into the hope that his audience will make the problem he presented a solution. Writing—1: This response demonstrates little cohesion and insufficient skill in the use and control of language. By exposing the domino effect of illiteracy into other large aspects of American society such as electing leaders, and the business world, Gioia succeeds in alarming the audience to the seriousness of the issue and instilling a sense of urgency to mend the problem. This facts helps people persuade the audience he also say that the world health organization classifies working night shift is bad. The writer includes no clear central claim or controlling idea and instead jumps into repeating ideas and phrases from the passage. Gioia is able to sway his audience to devote more time to the simple task of reading works of intellectual value through fearful diction and compelling consequences associated with being illiterate.
I think that this topic Bogard uses appeals to emotion to many different religious groups. This paragraph is not well-written and poorly considered. For example, at or near the end of each body paragraph, the writer restates the point that introduces that paragraph Bogard then gives a scientific case that shows why natural darkness is essential to humans. Through the emotion Bogard evokes, we suddenly feel defensive in preserving the darkness for the sake of our mental and physical health. When he describes literature, he simply says it diminished.
This tool is utilized to establish an emphasis on his primary point by highlighting it as a negative development relative to other changes in American life. The response also provides a variety of sentence structures and precise word choice and is free of significant language errors. Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the analytical task and offers only a partial analysis of how Gioia builds his argument. Nevertheless, in this example and others like it in the response, the writer exhibits effective analysis of the source text using relevant and sufficient support. He argues that intellectual abilities are decreacing.
Overall, this response demonstrates advanced writing. But people's common sense decisions may turn out to be wrong, even if they are thought to be correct according to the judgment of vast majorities of people. However, this is the last evidence of understanding the writer provides, as the essay ends almost immediately afterward. Sentence structure tends to be repetitive and simple, however. The writer captures the central idea of the source passage the importance of allowing more darkness to fill the earth for distinct health and ecological reasons and accurately quotes and paraphrases many important details from the passage. We must see the strength and beauty in the darkness, and remember how our world survived without lights.
Here, Bogard uses scientific fact to prove that natural darkness is a key to nature and ecology. That individuals at a time of crucial intellectual and emotional development bypass the joys and challenges of literature is a troubling trend. Body 3: The transitions between paragraphs are positive. Bogard then gives a scientific case that shows why natural darkness is essential to humans. Gioia states that during the past quarter century, American interest in literature has decreased. Although there are occasional missteps where the writer overreaches with language In order to achieve proper credibility and stir emotion, undeniable facts must reside in the passage , overall, this response demonstrates advanced writing skill. Analysis—1: This writer provides a limited analysis of the source text.